The Middle Ages That Never Were

A painting of a traditional mounted knight riding reside a traditional damsel

There seems to be a fixed idea that, at least until very recently, most fantasy has been set in a mediaeval-type setting. This is almost an article of faith to many people, in the face of all evidence, and shows that they have very little understanding of what mediaeval1 really means.

Some fantasy authors have certainly based their settings on mediaeval Europe, from William Morris to George R. R. Martin. However, this is only one of many models that traditional fantasy authors have used — though it’s undeniable that most have been centred on Europe or the Middle East.

Tolkien is often cited as an author who uses a mediaeval model, but in fact there’s very little mediaeval, as properly understood, in Lord of the Rings. The Shire is an idealised version of 19th century England without guns; Rohan is early Anglo-Saxon; the Dwarves are ancient Norse; Gondor has a distinctly Babylonian feel, although I suspect Tolkien was going for Solomon’s Israel; and some of the other cultures, such as Lothlorien, have no obvious real-world model.

Similarly, most of the pulp fantasy of the 30s and 40s, such as the Conan stories, tend to be set in a mashed-up imagining of the classical world and the pre-classical Middle East. Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser’s environment, on the other hand, has a lot in common with Renaissance Mediterranean culture. In general, while some mediaeval influence was there, it was only one type of setting among many.

What Were the Middle Ages?

The problem seems to be the common assumption that any pre-gunpowder period is mediaeval. In fact, the term only refers to a few hundred years (for part of which gunpowder actually was in use) on one of the world’s smallest continents.

To give a sense of perspective — besides Europe, civilisation has existed (before modern colonisation) in Asia, Africa, North America and South America2. The earliest known civilisation (i.e. people living in a city) was over 11,000 years ago, in the town later known as Jericho.

In reality, the Middle Ages (also known as the mediaeval period) didn’t exist at all. It was a sneering term coined in the Renaissance to dismiss western Europe between the fall of the classical world (good) and the birth of the new age (nearly as good). In the same way, the sometimes-exquisite art and architecture of the period was described as Gothic, implying it was the work of the barbarians who’d destroyed the Roman Empire.

The period the Renaissance scholars thus consigned to the scrapheap actually covers many different cultures, over both its timespan and its geographical distribution, although there are certain generalisations that can be made.

There isn’t even any clear agreement as to when it started or finished. To some extent, of course, all historical periods are just convenient places for historians to begin and end their books. Some periods have more obvious bookmarks, but it’s rare to have such a significant change that people living at the time would notice it.

My own view, with all possible disclaimers in place, is that the Middle Ages (to the extent that they existed at all) started in 732 AD3 and finished in 1453. On a Tuesday. At teatime.

When and How Did the Middle Ages Begin?

Everyone knows that the Roman Empire fell in the 5th century. Except that it didn’t. The Roman Empire had been changing and evolving throughout its lifetime, most obviously after the reforms of Diocletian in the late 3rd century. By the 5th century, it consisted mainly of barbarian warlords controlling their own territories and paying nominal fealty to the Emperor. This would have unrecognisable to Augustus, five hundred years earlier.

When the last western Emperor was deposed in 476, these warlords and their peoples just carried on the same way. The only difference was that they paid even more nominal fealty to the eastern Emperor in Constantinople, where the Roman Empire carried on until the 15th century.

For the most part, the barbarian warlords were proud of being part of the Empire. They fought the legions internally, as when the Emperor Honorius double-crossed the Visigoths and they besieged Rome, but they’d no wish to tear it down. Well, except for the Huns, but they were a rival empire, not a ravening horde.

Nothing substantially changed. Civilisation and culture had been declining through the later part of the imperium, most notably in the decline of cities and the rise of serfdom, and continued to do so. In fact, it wouldn’t have been obvious at the time that the Roman Empire was gone for good. It was just a pause.

In this situation, western Europe largely marked time and didn’t really move on to anything new till the Frankish leader Charles Martel smashed the Moors at the Battle of Tours in 732.

There are two reasons why this was crucial. For one thing, although Charles was never actually king of the Franks, his son was crowned and his grandson became Charles the Great — Charlemagne. By the time the Carolingian dynasty had played out, only a few generations later, the map of Europe had changed beyond recognition, the first signs of our modern nations were stirring, and the concept of empire had been updated.

The second reason was the reason why Charles Martel had won the battle. This was a radical new type of fighting-man he’d copied from the Byzantine Empire, called the knight.

Aristocrats in older civilisations are sometimes described as knights, but this is retrospective. The knight as we know him first arose in Persia, following the introduction of stirrups, which made heavy cavalry possible for the first time. Unfortunately, the equipment and, in particular, the great war-horses were expensive to keep up.

The Persians solved the problem by imposing crippling taxes on the cities, with the result that, when the Arabs invaded, the cities opened their gates and went over to a more reasonable enemy. The Byzantines, learning from this, came up with a new idea: to give each knight a parcel of land and let him pay his own way. It was this concept Charles adopted, and so the feudal system was born.

The feudal system was, if anything was, the central institution of the Middle Ages, and any fantasy setting that doesn’t have it can’t be described as mediaeval. In reality, it was two separate but complementary systems. One was a contract the king made with his nobles and knights, whereby he granted them land and they undertook to fight for him when called on. In fact, many knights were more interested in running their estates, and it became increasingly common, as the period wore on, for knights to pay money in lieu of service, which the king would use to hire mercenaries.

The other, which had existed since the later Roman period, was manorial serfdom. Serfs were distinct from slaves in that, though they weren’t free to leave or refuse to work, they belonged to a manor, not to a person.

They had rights, too, although that varied considerably from kingdom to kingdom. English serfs in general had the strongest rights. The feudal system wasn’t used in England until after 1066, and many of the people’s ancestral rights were restored a few decades later.

Serfs in other kingdoms were usually a lot worse off, but the lord of the manor didn’t legally have any power of life or death over them. Of course, that assumed that they’d be held to account if they broke the law — which sometimes happened.

When and How Did the Middle Ages End?

And what about the end of the Middle Ages? 1453 was the year that Constantinople, the last remnant of the Roman Empire, fell to the Turks. The immediate significance was that many scholars and artists fled to the west, fuelling the already growing Renaissance in learning and the arts.

In fact, the Renaissance wasn’t a sudden development, and the Middle Ages weren’t quite as culturally bleak a period as they’re often painted, although certainly a low point. Knowledge had been seeping in for some time. Much of this had come from the Islamic world, at that time the most culturally advanced civilisation in the west. Art certainly took a huge step forward in the Renaissance, but it’s been suggested that the biggest academic change was that they started following Plato instead of Aristotle.

Besides the Renaissance, though, the mid-15th century marks a point where most of the characteristics of the Early Modern age were already becoming established. Gunpowder had come to stay and was making the transition from field guns to hand guns, rendering knights obsolete. Gutenberg was setting up his printing press in Mainz, and the voyages of discovery were well under way — the Portuguese were venturing down the African coast en route to India, leading the Spanish eventually to try another direction.

Social mobility was growing, too, as was religious dissent. Neither were anything like as absent from the Middle Ages as is often assumed, but both increased immensely after the Black Death.

The mediaeval Church was either divided or powerless for much of the period, and there’d been radical preachers from at least the 12th century whose arguments were essentially similar to Luther’s four hundred years later. By the 15th century, spurred by widespread distrust of a Church that had been able to do nothing about the Plague, dissenting movements led by Wycliffe, Ball, Huss and many others became bigger and better organised. Luther’s was simply the most successful of these.

In the same way, there had been towns and cities throughout the Middle Ages, and industries had flourished there. It wasn’t easy to escape from serfdom, except by going into the Church, but those who managed it had the chance of getting rich. After the Black Death, the feudal restraints became untenable, due to the shortage of manpower making labour a marketable commodity. The powers that be fought a long rearguard action against change, but it was becoming inevitable.

Know Your Middle Ages

The Middle Ages were a long and varied period — even without considering the great civilisations that flourished outside western Europe — and almost everything changed in their course. The armour worn by knights, for instance, developed from ring-mail sewn onto leather to the familiar suits of plate armour (which, contrary to popular belief, were not too heavy to manoeuvre in), driven by changing weapon technology.

At any given time, none of the typical mediaeval institutions were present everywhere, and some areas — Scandinavia, for instance — were barely affected till very late in the period.

So, if you want to create a fantasy setting “based on the mediaeval period”, by all means do so — you’ll be in good company. Decide what you actually mean by that, though, and do plenty of research on the specific country and era that interests you.

On the other hand, if all you want is for your hero to wield a sword or use a bow and arrow, you have an entire planet and eleven thousand years of civilisation to your model your world on. Why not have fun?

1 The original and most accurate spelling of the word is mediaeval, but medieval is now more common and acceptable. Seeing the word (as I all too often have) spelt midevil makes me want to stick my head in a bucket of water and scream. Please don’t make me do that.

2 Pre-colonial Australia can’t exactly be described as a civilisation, in the strict sense, though that doesn’t make its cultures any less rich and fascinating.

3 Yes, I use BC and AD, which have served perfectly well for the past 1500 years. Get over it.

2 thoughts on “The Middle Ages That Never Were

  1. A good summary of a complex topic and era. One thing I would add is that some of the unreasonable activities that are often linked to the Middle Ages: trials for witchcraft and the inquisition, are much more products of the renaissance and enlightenment. I’d also add that serfdom was undoubtedly bad, but it was a huge advance over Roman style slavery, which produced one of the few populations (the slaves) who over an extended period of time had negative population growth. The university system was born in the Middle ages and a the spirit of academic inquiry that in later eras changed pretty much everything. For sure, there was plenty of superstition, sanitation was terrible and life was hard for almost everyone. Whereas today, in many parts of the world, we have toilets.

    Like

    1. Some good points, Andy. Obviously, I only had time for a brief summary of the period, and yes, all these things were important features. Although actually the idea that everyone was filthy applied much more to after the Black Death than before, as bathing was one of the things many people believed had spread the Plague. Not that they were especially hygienic by modern (or even Roman) standards even before that.

      Like

Leave a comment